Goodboy Picture Company | E+ | Getty Images
Business: Envestnet gives wealth administration companies and software program to the funding neighborhood. It has an wonderful product with 90% retention and secular tailwinds. Envestnet was based in 1999 by Jud Bergman and Bill Crager. Bergman was chairman and CEO of the corporate from 1999 by way of October 2019 when he was tragically killed in a automotive accident. Bill Crager took over as interim CEO and in March 2020 turned everlasting CEO.
Stock Market Value: $3.1B ($56.14 per share)
Percentage Ownership: 7.20%
Average Cost: $72.65
Activist Commentary: Impactive Capital is an activist hedge fund based in 2018 by Lauren Taylor Wolfe and Christian Alejandro Asmar. Impactive Capital is an energetic ESG (AESG™) investor that launched with a $250 million funding from CalSTRS and now has over $2 billion. In simply three years, they’ve made fairly a reputation for themselves as AESG™ buyers. Wolfe and Asmar realized that there was an alternative to use instruments, notably on the social and environmental facet, to drive returns. Impactive focuses on optimistic systemic change to assist construct extra aggressive, sustainable companies for the long term. Impactive will use all the conventional operational, monetary and strategic instruments that activists use, however will even implement ESG change that they imagine is materials to the enterprise and drives profitability of the corporate and shareholder worth.
On Nov. 15, Impactive despatched a letter to Envestnet expressing their disappointment within the firm’s efficiency. Additionally, Impactive famous that they may take into account nominating a slate of administrators for the corporate’s next annual assembly if Lauren Taylor Wolfe, Impactive’s co-founder and managing associate, is not instantly appointed to the board.
In many activist campaigns, it is troublesome to decide who is sporting the black hat and who is sporting the white hat. Often the burden is on the activist to show they’re sporting the white hat. In this example it is very clear that Impactive is sporting the white hat and shareholders needs to be placing the burden on the incumbent board to show in any other case.
- Owns 7.2% of widespread inventory
- Has been a shareholder for 18 months
- Engaged privately with the corporate a few board seat 5 months in the past earlier than going public
- Asked for just one seat on the seven-person board
- Written its first public letter in its historical past — an extended, detailed considerate letter
- Has a powerful fame as an amicable, revered and value-creating activist
- Owns lower than 1% of widespread inventory
- Underperformed the S&P 500 by 124% in the course of the chairman’s seven-year tenure on the board
- Underperformed proxy friends by 243.5% throughout the identical time-frame
- Has not added a brand new board member in seven years (as of the 2023 annual assembly) — aside from the brand new CEO
- Is a staggered board at a time when most firms are gravitating to good company governance
- Paid the seven-director board $19 million over the previous 5 years, throughout which era they underperformed the S&P500 by 65.5% and their proxy friends by 113.5%
Now, Impactive is ready they don’t like to be in and certain didn’t count on to be in – partaking in a proxy struggle for board seats. They are justifiably going for a full slate of three administrators on the staggered board. Two of the incumbent administrators who might be focused are a 22-year tenured director and the chairman of the corporate. Impactive desires board illustration to get Envestnet to higher align pay for efficiency, refocus on capital allocation and bolster long-term shareholder worth.
This is one of many worst activist protection campaigns I’ve ever seen. Anyone with any understanding of Impactive, Envestnet’s efficiency and the incumbent board would know that Impactive is certain to get at least one board seat in a proxy struggle. And that is one among seven — it could be the chairman who is voted off the board. Impactive supplied one among eight with no incumbent shedding a board seat. Moreover, Impactive is probably to get two board seats at an organization like this, perhaps even three.
My guess is that Envestnet’s advisors suggested the board that Impactive has by no means commenced a proxy struggle earlier than and is not going to do this right here. Well, they could not have been extra fallacious. I additionally count on that as the corporate hears from its giant shareholders, they may see the writing on the wall and are available again to Impactive with an supply for board illustration and this may finally settle. Taking this all the best way to a vote can be an amazing waste of shareholder cash and administration time to get to an end result that is considerably predestined underneath these information and circumstances. The longer the corporate prolongs this struggle, the extra the shareholders are going to facet with Impactive.
Ken Squire is the founder and president of 13D Monitor, an institutional analysis service on shareholder activism, and he is the founder and portfolio supervisor of the 13D Activist Fund, a mutual fund that invests in a portfolio of activist 13D investments. Squire is additionally the creator of the AESG™ funding class, an activist funding type centered on enhancing ESG practices of portfolio firms.